UJJAL BHUYAN, CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
G. Anil Chandvs – Appellant
Versus
Authorized Officer – Respondent
JUDGMENT AND ORDER:
(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ujjal Bhuyan)
All the above three writ petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. We have heard Sri R.Sushanth Reddy, learned counsel and Sri Vivek Jain, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.No.23804 of 2018 and W.P.No.23805 of 2018; Sri Ashwin Kumar Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.No.25432 of 2018; and Sri Sharad Sanghi, learned counsel for the respondents in all the writ petitions.
W.P.No.23804 of 2018:
3. This writ petition has been filed by G.Anil Chand and G.Ramesh Kumar assailing the legality and validity of the order dated 02.05.2018 passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, in Appeal No.207/2017/532-534, confirming the order dated 23.05.2017 passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II at Hyderabad (Tribunal) in S.A.No.651 of 2017.
4. Petitioners are the auction purchasers who had purchased the schedule property through auction sale. They are aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal setting aside the auction sale which order has been affirmed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata (Appellate Tribunal) in appeal filed by the petitioners.
5.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.