SAMIT GOPAL
Shani – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. List revised.
2. Heard Sri Vijay Shantam, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ajay Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the material on record.
3. Sri Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the first informant is not present even when the matter is taken in the revised list.
4. This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant-Shani, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 86 of 2019, under Section 376 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 POCSO Act, 2012, registered at Police Station Banna Devi, District Aligarh.
5. On 07.07.2023 the following order was passed by this Court:-
2. Heard Shri Vijay Shantam, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri J.P. Tripathi, learned counsel for the State. Shri Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the first informant is not present despite the matter being taken up in revised.
3. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant had claimed juvenility which has been rejected by the court concerned against which revision has been preferred before this Court which is pending consideration being Criminal Revision
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.