Rahul vs State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 1267

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 1267

ATTAU RAHMAN MASOODI, UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Rahul – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Shyam Kinkar Pandey, Atul Verma, Hari Krishna Verma, Himanshu Tiwari, Rajesh Kumar, Rajeshwar.

Table of Content
1. conviction and sentencing details. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments against premeditated intent are discussed. (Para 9)
3. appellant's grounds of appeal. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. testimony from the informant and cross-examination. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
5. sister's testimony and contradictions. (Para 17 , 18)
6. medical testimonies and injury details. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
7. inquest details and procedural observations. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
8. court's perspective on evidence. (Para 38 , 39 , 40)
9. legal definitions and implications of mens rea. (Para 41 , 42 , 43)
10. criminal liability principles and their scope. (Para 44 , 45 , 46)
11. discussion on mens rea and joint liability. (Para 64 , 74)
12. culpable homicide vs. murder definitions. (Para 68 , 69 , 70 , 71)
13. court clarifies the nature of culpable homicide under ipc. (Para 72 , 78)
14. final judgment and sentence reduction. (Para 90 , 91 , 92)

JUDGMENT :

UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA, J.

1. Heard Sri Atul Verma, learned counsel for the appellant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the reco

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(All) 1267

ATTAU RAHMAN MASOODI, UMESH CHANDRA SHARMARahul – AppellantVersusState of U. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (17)

ATTAU RAHMAN MASOODI, UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Rahul – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent