Sandeep Yadav Thru. Brother Pradeep Yadav vs Union Of India Thru. Secy. Govt. Of India Mini. Of Home Thru. Joint Secy. (Inernal Secuty. )

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Rajendra Prasad Mishra
For the Respondent: A.S.G.I., Dr. Pooja Singh, Dr Pooja Singh, G.A.

Table of Content
1. habeas corpus petitions can challenge preventive detention orders under specific statutory provisions. (Para 1)
2. details of the substantial offense leading to detention. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
3. circumstances surrounding the detention order leading to concerns of public order. (Para 6 , 7 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. judicial observations regarding the nature of the offense and its impact on public order. (Para 20 , 25 , 26 , 30 , 33 , 34)
5. arguments against the application of the detention order citing public order vs. law and order. (Para 21 , 23 , 27 , 28)
6. legal arguments can be founded upon established case law asserting distinctions in public and private order. (Para 22)
7. clinical assessments of public order necessitate recognizing a singular incident's broader societal implications. (Para 24)
8. temporal relevance and the nature of individual acts are critical in grounding a detention order. (Para 32 , 38 , 40)
9. judicial conclusions must establish the exercise of discretion by the detaining authority. (Para 58)
10. the conclusion declaring the detention order illegal. (Para 59)

JUDGMENT :

Narendra Kumar Johari, J.

1. Heard Shri R.P. Mishra, learned counsel for the peti