Noor Alam vs State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 1672

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 1672

AJAY BHANOT
Noor Alam – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Irshad Ahmad, Abhishek Kumar Saroj, Kumar Parikshit, Nagendra Bahadur Singh, Rageeni, Rajesh Mishra, Rajesh Chandra Dwivedi, Ajay Kumar Pathak, Ashish Kumar Dubey, Praveen Kumar Srivastava, Ray Sahab Yadav, Abhay Raj.

JUDGMENT :

AJAY BHANOT, J.

1. The judgment is being structured in the following conceptual framework to facilitate the discussion:

(I)	Facts
(II)	Submissions of counsels
(III)	Bail Jurisdiction and Legal Issues
(IV)	Right to Speedy Trial and Bails
(V)	Strikes and the Law
(VI)	Role of lawyers, Courts and Bar Council
(VII)	Directions
(VIII)	Order in Bail Application

2. Heard Shri Kumar Parikshit, learned counsel assisted by Shri Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Ashok Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and Shri Paritosh Kumar Malviya, learned AGA-I.

(I) Facts

3. Affidavit filed by Shri Ashok Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh on 15.02.2023 is taken in the record.

4. This is the third bail application. While rejecting the first bail application being Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 23828 of 2018 on 27.06.2018, this Court issued the following directions:

“It is expected from the learned trial court to gear up the trial and made necessary endeavour to conclu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(All) 1672

AJAY BHANOTNoor Alam – AppellantVersusState of U. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

AJAY BHANOT
Noor Alam – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent