Bhavesh Jain VS State Of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

VIKAS KUNVAR SRIVASTAV
Bhavesh Jain – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Satish Chandra Mishra, Neha Rashmi and Gantavya.
For the Respondent: Santosh Kumar Mishra

Table of Content
1. background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. allegations against the applicant (Para 9 , 10)
3. legal arguments presented (Para 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19)
4. high court's jurisdiction and powers (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
5. interpretation of relevant legal provisions (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
6. outcome of the court’s analysis (Para 35 , 36 , 37)
7. final judgment and order (Para 38 , 39)

JUDGMENT :

1. The instant application moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is directed against the summoning order dated 9.9.2021 issued in Session Case No.752 of 2021 titled “ C.B.I. Vs. Md. Azam Khan etc ” under Sections 201 , 204, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C. and Section 66 of the I.T Act, 2000 and all orders passed in furtherance whereof qua the applicant, “Bhavesh Jain” one of the accused charge sheeted in Case Crime No.2 of 2018 in Session Case No.752 of 2021 pending before the Special Court, Anti-Corruption, C.B.I. (Central), Lucknow.

2. It is stated in the application that the F.I.R. No.2 of 2018 was filed on 25.4.2018, alleging certain irregularities in recruitment of candidates to 1300 posts of the R.G.C.'s, J.E.'s, A.E.'s advertised by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

VIKAS KUNVAR SRIVASTAVBhavesh Jain – AppellantVersusState Of U. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (8)

VIKAS KUNVAR SRIVASTAV
Bhavesh Jain – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent