NAND PRABHA SHUKLA
Brijkishor Sahu @ Bittu – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NAND PRABHA SHUKLA, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the appellants is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. This criminal appeal has been preferred under Section 14-A (1) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as ‘SC/ST Act’) against the Summoning Order dated 20.12.2023 as well as charge sheet dated 22.08.2023 passed by learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Jhansi in S.T. No. 1458 of 2023 in Case Crime No. 0330 of 2023, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 352 IPC and Section 3(2)(v-a) of the SC/ST Act, Police Station-Nawabad, District-Jhansi.
4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the parties that during the pendency of the present appeal the parties have entered into compromise and have settled the dispute vide compromise dated 08.10.2023 which is placed as Annexure No. 3 to the present appeal. The said compromise has been duly verified by learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Jhansi on 29.02.2024. According to the report submitted by District Magistrate, Jhansi, no compensation has b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.