SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2748

SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV
Preetam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Rahul Kumar Jadaun
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT

Shekhar Kumar Yadav, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State, and perused the material available on record.

2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants for quashing the entire proceeding of S. T. No. 81 of 2017, ( State v. Preetam Singh and others), under Sections 323 , 504 IPC and section 3(1)(X) of the SC/ST Act, P.S. Jalaun, District Jalaun arising out of Case Crime No. 361 of 2006 on the basis of the compromise entered into between the parties.

3. The parties, out of their own free will, have settled their dispute amicably and in furtherance thereof, they have filed a compromise deed annexed as Annexure No. 4 to the application. Thereafter, this Court, vide order 04.08.2022, has sent the said compromise deed to the trial court with a direction to get the same verified and submit a report.

4. Learned counsel for the applicants have not disputed the fact that the parties have settled their dispute amicably and they have filed compromise deed and the same has been verified by the trial Court, vide order dated 23.08.2022, verification report is kept on record of this case.

5. In the present case, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top