Kalloo @ Alok vs State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 2749

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 2749

SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV
Kalloo @ Alok – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Ashutosh Upadhyay
For the Opposite Party : G.A., Rahul Dwivedi

Table of Content
1. settlement of disputes in criminal cases (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. opposition to compromise based on sc/st act (Para 9)
3. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. quashing of fir due to settlement (Para 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT

Shekhar Kumar Yadav, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and perused the material available on record.

2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants for quashing the entire proceeding of S.S.T. No. 126 of 2018 (State v. Kallu @ Alok), arising out of Case Crime No. 168 of 2018, under Sections 323 , 504, 506,332,353 IPC and Section 3(1)Da, Dha SC/ST Act, P.S. Rajpura, District Sambhal.

3. The parties, out of their own free will, have settled their dispute amicably.

4. Pursuant to the order dated 28.07.2022 passed in Application under Section 482 No. 22293 of 2022, parties appeared before the court below and the court below vide order dated 05.08.2022 verified the compromise deed filed by the parties.

5. Learned counsel for the parties have not disputed the fact that the parties have settled their dispute amicably.

6. In the p