ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA
Shiv Ji Agrahari – Appellant
Versus
Urmila Srivastava – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri Syed Wajid Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri A.K. Pathak, learned counsel for the caveator-respondent no. 2.
2. The challenge in this petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is to the order dated 08.01.2024 passed by the learned Additional District Judge/Court No. 6, Gorakhpur, in SCC Revision No. 38 of 2022 whereby and whereunder the amendment application moved by the petitioner seeking amendment in the written statement at the Revisional Stage has been rejected.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that he is a tenant in a premises let out to his deceased father in the year 2004 initially at Rs. 680/-per month subsequently enhanced to Rs. 1800/-per month. The premises is newly constructed and the provisions of the UP Act No. 13 of 1972 are not applicable. The landlord/respondents have instituted a SCC Suit, being SCC Suit No. 4 of 2015 for his eviction and recovery for arrears of rent and damages. The petitioner put in appearance in the proceedings and filed his written statement denying the plaint averments and specifically stating in para 22 of the written statement that on 28.03.2016 with the permission of the Court a sum o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.