SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 229

MANISH KUMAR
Shiv Pratap Maurya – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Through Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Medical Health – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Parties : Vidhu Bhushan Kalia, Adarsh Saxena, Mahesh Chandra Chaturvedi, Mohd.Zafar Khan, Nandita Bharti, Puneet Chandra, Ravi Shanker Tiwari, Dinesh Kumar Arya, Sandeep Dixit, Kumar Ayush, Aashish Srivastava, Kanhaiya Lal Verma, Narendra Kumar Pandey, Ravindra Nath Mishra, K.K. Singh, Rajeev Kumar Ojha, Ajay Kumar Singh, Ganga Prasad Mishra, Ghaus Beg, Aashish Srivastava, Prashant Singh Atal, Rajat Pratap Singh, Amit Kumar Tiwari, Vivek Prakash Mishra, O.P. Tiwari, Mahendra Kumar Misra, Aashish Srivastava, Vishal Kumar Upadhyay, Anuj Dayal, Ajit Kumar Dwivedi, Mohd. Shahzaan Naiyer, V.B. Kalia, Varadraj Shreedutt Ojha, Anjani Kumar, Miss. Alka Saxena, Anoop Kumar Bajpai, Anand Dwivedi, Arpit Kumar, Satish Chandra Rai.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Shri Sandeep Dixit, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Vidhu Bhushan Kalia, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri S.B. Pandey, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Mahendra Kumar Mishra, learned Counsel for the Union of India, Shri Kuldeep Pati Tripathi, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by learned Standing Counsel and Shri Puneet Chandra, learned counsel for the National Health Mission.

2. Since in all the petitions same issue & controversy is involved, so they have been heard together and decided by this common judgment.

3. All the writ petitions are having almost the identical prayers and it would be difficult to mention the prayers of all the petitions but for convenience, the prayer made in the leading petition No. 1453 of 2014 (Shiv Pratap Maurya and 667 others Vs. State of U.P. and others) are being quoted hereinbelow:-

    "i) to issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned orders dated 22.11.2013, 11.12.2013 and 26.02.2014 issued by the respondent no. 3, 7 and 4 respectively, so far as the same provides approval of services of the petitioners till 31.03.2014 and also to the extent the same p

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
          whatsapp-icon Back to top