AJIT KUMAR
Shail Kumar Chaube – Appellant
Versus
Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri G.K. Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Udai Chandani, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.K. Upadhya, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Ritvik Upadhya, learned counsel for the Respondent-University.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is confining his writ petition only to the resolution adopted by the Executive Council dated 27.09.2019 and the consequential order of Registrar dated 21.10.2019.
3. Petitioner while working as a professor in the Department of Zoology Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University was awarded with the punishment in the nature of compulsory retirement from service vide resolution adopted by the Executive Council in its meeting held on 27.09.2019 (Item No.19) and the consequential order passed by Registrar of the University dated 21.10.2019. It is this resolution of the Executive Council and the consequential order passed by the Registrar that are put to challenge before this Court in the present petition on the ground that the Executive Council being the disciplinary authority under Banaras Hindu University Act, 1915 and the statute framed thereunder exercis
Gajadhar Prasad Mishra vs. Vice Chancellor, University of Allahabad and Others
Neelima Mishra vs. Harindar Kaur Paintal
Roop Singh Negi vs. Punjab National Bank and Others
Apparel Export Promotion Council vs. A.K. Chopra
Champaklal Chimanlal Shah v. The Union of India
State of Assam and Anr. v. Mahendra Kumar Das and Ors.
Khem Chand v. Union of India and Ors.
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Om Prakash Gupta
K.L. Tripathi v. State of Bank of India and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.