IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW
Om Prakash Shukla, J.
C/M Rahat Janta Inter College Thru Manager Arshad Khan And Anr. - Petitioner
Vs.
State Of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Deptt Of Secondary Education Lko And Others - Respondent
Writ - A No. - 4914 of 2022
Decided On : 22-02-2024
Minority Institution - Appointment of Class-III Clerk - Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Section 18 (Cha-Cha) - Government Orders dated 15.02.2007, 21.08.2014, and 29.10.2014 - The court discussed the applicability of Regulation 101 of the Intermediate Education Act to minority institutions, the limited role of the District Inspector of Schools in such institutions, and the privileges enjoyed by minority institutions under Articles 29 and 30 of the Constitution of India. The court also highlighted the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in T.M.A. Pal Foundation Vs. State of Karnataka and P.A. Inamdar Vs. State of Maharastra, emphasizing the autonomy of minority educational institutions in the appointment of teaching and non-teaching staff.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, a minority institution, advertised three posts of Class-III Clerk and three Class-IV posts. The District Inspector of Schools raised objections, leading to the cancellation of the appointment by the Director of Education (Secondary). The petitioners challenged the cancellation through a writ petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the impugned letters were issued without proper application of mind and ignored the privileges enjoyed by the minority institution. It held that the Director of Education (Secondary) and the District Inspector of Schools neglected the distinction between minority and non-minority institutions and quashed the impugned letters.
Issues: The issues revolved around the applicability of regulations to minority institutions, the authority of the District Inspector of Schools in such institutions, and the autonomy of minority educational institutions in staff appointments.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the autonomy of minority educational institutions in the appointment of teaching and non-teaching staff, as well as the limited role of the District Inspector of Schools in examining the qualifications of selected candidates in minority institutions.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the impugned letters were quashed. The District Inspector of Schools was directed to reconsider the matter and pass appropriate orders after affording the petitioners an opportunity of hearing.
JUDGMENT :
Om Prakash Shukla, J.
A. Introduction
(1) This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners with the following main reliefs :-
ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order/letter dated 30-03-2022 to the extent of cancelling the appointment on the post of Class-III post which is contained in as Annexure no.1 to the writ petition.
iii. Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to approved the two appointment of Clerk made by the petitioner’s Institution on the basis of submitting the papers regarding the appointment of Class-III post by letter dated 22- 10-2021 which is contained as Annexure no.15 to the writ petition.”
B. Factual Matrix
2. The facts, in nutshell, are that Anjuman Talim Dargah is a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. It is a minority organization and has established and is presently running private college, namely, Rahat Janta Inter College situated at Nanpara, District Bahraich (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Institution’). The Institution is managed by a 'Committee of Management (petitioner no.1)' (for short 'the Management') as per the Scheme of Administration. The institution is an aided private minority institution and is governed by the provisions of Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921. Petitioner No.2-Arshad Khan is said to be the Manager of the Institution.
3. It is the case of the petitioners that in the Institution, there is one sanctioned post of Principal, 6 sanctioned posts of Lecturer, 15 sanctioned posts of Assistant Teacher L.T. Grade, 10 sanctioned posts of Assistant Teacher C.T. Grade, 3 sanctioned post of Routine Grade Clerk and 12 sanctioned posts of Peons. According to the petitioners, the State Government had issued a Government Order dated 15.02.2007, providing that in case of minority institution, no prior permission from any authority is required before publication of advertisement for filling up of vacancies of the approved/sanctioned post of teachers/lecturers. Again, the State Government had issued another Government Order dated 21.08.2014 in relation to one Smt. Shaista Ali on the post of Assistant Clerk, wherein the State Government had relied upon the earlier Government Order dated 12.02.2007, which specifically stated that in respect of minority Institution, Section 18 (Cha-Cha) of Intermediate Education Act, 1921 is applicable and further there is no provisions for taking prior permission or restriction for minority Institution for making appointment on Class-III posts.
4. It has been stated by the petitioners that after the Government Order dated 21.08.2014, the Director of Education has issued a letter on 29.10.2014, directing all the District Inspector of Schools saying that the Government Order dated 21.08.2014 is related to minority institution of Ashashkiya Sahayata Prapt for appointment on Class-III post and the Director of Education has further directed all the District Inspector of Schools to proceed on the basis of the Government Order dated 21.08.2014.
5. Further case of the petitioner is that on the basis of Government Orders dated 15.02.2007, 21.08.2014 and 29.10.2014, petitioners’ institution had advertised three posts of Class-III (Clerk) and three Class-IV posts on 04.09.2021 in two newspapers, namely, Rashtriya Sahara and Daily Shahafat (in Urdu Language). In pursuance of the said advertisement, number of eligible candidates have submitted requisite applications for the aforesaid posts. The Manager of the Institute (petitioner no.2), vide letter dated 21.09.2021, had informed the District Inspector of Schools regarding the
Mohd. Faizan and others Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2013 (5) ADJ 471
Jagdish Singh vs. State of U.P. and others
Regulation 101 of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 applies to minority institutions, mandating prior approval from the DIOS for non-teaching staff appointments to ensure compliance with stat....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need for compliance with the MEPS Act, 1981, in the context of minority institutions and the interpretation of the act in relation to staffi....
The eligibility criteria for appointment as an Officiating/Incharge Principal of an Intermediate College recognized and governed under the Intermediate Education Act, 1921.
Minorities Educational Institution - Establishment and administration of - Minority Educational Institutions under Article 30(1) of Constitution of India have a right to appoint teaching staff includ....
A candidate has a right to be considered in light of existing Rules which implies Rules in force as on date of consideration.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.