SIDDHARTHA VARMA, ANISH KUMAR GUPTA
Kavita Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer that the Joint Inquiry Report dated 22.5.2019 submitted by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue), District Moradabad and the Assistant Inspector General (Registration), District Moradabad in respect of a sale-deed executed on 4.7.1956 and registered on 25.7.1956, which was found to be registered as Document No. 1335, at Bahi No. 1, Jild No. 892 at Page Nos. 265 to 266 and was registered before the Sub-Registrar, Moradabad, be quashed.
2. A further prayer has been made that the petitioner be not proceeded against with regard to the registered document i.e. sale-deed dated 25.7.1956 in pursuance of the Inquiry Report dated 22.5.2019.
3. The petitioner has contended that a sale-deed was registered on 25.7.1956 in favour of one Vijay Kumar Sharma, the father of the petitioner herein and the vendor was one Smt. Prem Kunwar, widow of Prasadi Lal. It is the further contention of the petitioner that the name of Sri Vijay Kumar Sharma was mutated on 25.10.1956. Further it has been argued that after Vijay Kumar Sharma died on 13.2.2011, an application for mutation was moved by the petitioner whic
Corporation of the City of Bangalore vs. M. Papaiah and Another
Guru Amarjit Singh vs. Rattan Chand and Others
Hari Vishnu Kamath vs. Ahmad Ishaque and Others
Jamila Begam vs. Shami Mohd. (2019) 2 SCC 727
State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Keshav Ram and Others
Union of India and Others vs. Vasavi Co-Op. Housing Society Ltd. and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.