SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Tanu Jetly – Appellant
Versus
The Chairman/Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri. Santosh Kumar Giri Advocate, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, who has submitted that the petitioner is working as a P.R.T. teacher in Army Public School, Bareilly Cantt., Bareilly and she is seeking a direction for continuance her service as such and for regularization her services.
2. It has been pleaded in the writ Petition that the petitioner was appointed on the post of P.R.T. teacher in Army Public School, Bareilly Cantt., Bareilly on contractual basis on 19.08.2010/18.07.2010 initially for a period of two years. On 16.07.2012, the petitioner was again appointed for a period of three years from 26.07.2012 to 25.07.2015. On 11.08.2015, she was appointed afresh for a period of three years. Another contract of service was executed on 14.08.2018 for three years and thereafter another contract of service was executed on 20.07.2018 for the period up to 19.07.2021.
3. Lastly, the petitioner was issued an appointment letter dated 27.09.2021 appointing her for a fixed tenure from 04.10.2021 to 31.03.2024. On 08.01.2024, the petitioner was sent an intimated that her service contract will expire on 31.03.2024 and she can appear for fresh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.