KRISHAN PAHAL
Puttan@ Sunder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of UP – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Hon'ble Krishan Pahal, J.)
1. As informed by learned AGA, notice to the informant has been served on 11.07.2024 but none is present on behalf of the informant.
2. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 513 of 2023, under Sections 363, 366, 376 of I.P.C. and Sections 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station -Narkhi, District -Firozabad, during the pendency of trial.
PROSECUTION STORY:
4. The applicant and one Deepak are stated to have enticed away the minor daughter of the informant on 05.11.2023 at about 01:00 PM.
ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT:
5. The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. He has nothing to do with the said offence as alleged in the FIR.
6. The victim has categorically denied the fact that she knows the applicant, as such, the applicant is entitled for bail.
7. The applicant has no previous criminal history except one case which has been instituted by the same informant against him as FIR No.196 of 2024 subsequent to the instant case.
8. Several
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.