SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 821

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, J.
Raj Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh and others – Respondents
Writ A No.15077 of 2021
Decided on : 20-05-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Shantanu Khare, Sr. Advocate
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Abhishek Srivastava, Aditya Kumar Singh, Shishir Prakash

Employers can prescribe qualifications for recruitment but cannot arbitrarily exclude valid certificates, particularly those recognized by law.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ petition challenging exclusion from consideration for the post of Technician Grade-II (Fitter) based on High School Certificate from NIOS - Office order dated 16.01.2014 deemed invalid as it broadly excludes all distance learning qualifications - Court emphasizes that employers can prescribe qualifications but must not discriminate against valid certificates. (Paras 1, 9, 42)

(B) Validity of Qualifications - The court held that while degrees from recognized institutions must be honored, employers have the right to specify the mode of education for certain posts, especially technical ones. (Paras 41, 42)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a disqualified candidate for Technician Grade-II (Fitter), challenged the exclusion based on his High School Certificate from NIOS, arguing it was a valid qualification. (Paras 1-4)

Findings of Court:
The court found the exclusion based on distance learning qualifications to be overly broad and not justified, emphasizing the need for valid qualifications to be recognized. (Paras 44)

Issues: The main issues were whether the office order excluding distance learning qualifications was valid and if the petitioner’s qualification should be recognized. (Paras 9, 42)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that while employers can set qualifications, they cannot arbitrarily exclude valid qualifications, especially when they are recognized by law. (Paras 41, 42)

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble J.J. Munir, J.

1. This writ petition has been preferred by Raj Bhardwaj, a disqualified candidate for the post of a Technician Grade-II (Fitter), who applied for the said post in response to advertisement No. U-37/UPRVUSA/2019 issued by the Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Sewa Ayog, Lucknow (for short, 'the Service Commission'). He questions an office order dated 16.01.2014 issued by the Service Commission to the extent it excludes from consideration candidates, who have earned their High School Certificate or equivalent qualification from the National Institute of Open Schooling (for short, 'NIOS'). The petitioner further prays that a mandamus be issued to the Service Commission to treat the petitioner a duly qualified candidate for the post of Technician Grade-II (Fitter), without objection to his High School Certificate being one earned from the NIOS. The petitioner also prays for a mandamus, commanding the respondents to appoint him on the post of Technician Grade-II (Fitter) on the basis of selection held pursuant to Advertisement No. U-37/UPRVUSA/2019, within a period to be stipulated by this Court.

2. The facts giving rise to this petition are these:

    An advertisement bearing No. U-37/UPRVUSA/2019 was issued by the Service Commission, inviting applications for various categories of Group-C and Group-D posts in the Establishment. The Service Commission advertised, amongst others, post of Technician Grade-II (Fitter). According to the petitioner's case, the qualifications advertised in the advertisement for the post of Technician Grade-II (Fitter) (for short, 'the post in question') are as follows:

^^VsDuhf'k;u Js.kh&f}rh; ¼fQVj½ in gsrq&

ek/;fed f'k{kk ifj"kn mŸkj izns'k dh gkbZ Ldwy foKku ,oa xf.kr fo"k; ds lkFk ;k led{k ijh{kk mŸkh.kZ rFkk fQVVj VªsM esa vf[ky Hkkjrh; jkT; O;ko'kkbd izek.ki=A

DOEACC (orZeku es NIELIT) }kjk iznŸk 80 ?kaVs dk dkslZ vkWu dEI;qVj dkUlsIV (CCC) dk izek.ki= vfHkys[kh; ijh{k.k ds le; izLrqr djuk vfuok;Z gksxkA^^

3. The petitioner says that he belongs to the unreserved category and is qualified for the post in question. He was eligible to apply. The petitioner has passed his Secondary School Certificate Examination, earning that certificate from the NIOS with Science and Mathematics as his subjects. He also holds a National Trade Certificate in the Fitter's Trade. Apart from these, the petitioner also holds a Course on Computer Concepts Certificate (for short, 'CCC Certificate') awarded by the National Institute of Electronics & Information Technology (for short, 'the NIELIT'). The petitioner applied for the post in question, appending copies of his mark-sheets and certificates. The petitioner's application, being found in order, he was allotted Roll No. 11412010252. He was issued with an Admit Card for participating in the Computer Based Test. The Computer Based Test was held on 05.04.2021. The petitioner appeared in the said Test from an Examination Centre at Ghaziabad. The result of the Computer Based Test, declared on 09.09.2021, showed the petitioner as qualified. He was, therefore, called to participate in the document verification scheduled for 18.09.2021.

The petitioner was also issued a separate call letter for participating in the document verification to be held on 18.09.2021. The petitioner says that in accordance with the notice, calling him for participation in the document verification, he appeared for the verification of his documents on the scheduled date, time and venue. At the time of verification, the Trade Certificate held by the petitioner, issued by the Industrial Training Institute (for short, ‘the ITI’) and the CCC Certificate possessed by him, granted by the NIELIT, were accepted, without objection. However, there was objection to the High School Certificate held by the petitioner on ground that the said certificate had been earned by the petitioner from the NIOS, which was a certificate granted under a system of distance learning. It rendered the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top