IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, J.
Raj Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh and others – Respondents
Writ A No.15077 of 2021
Decided on : 20-05-2024
JUDGMENT :
Hon'ble J.J. Munir, J.
1. This writ petition has been preferred by Raj Bhardwaj, a disqualified candidate for the post of a Technician Grade-II (Fitter), who applied for the said post in response to advertisement No. U-37/UPRVUSA/2019 issued by the Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Sewa Ayog, Lucknow (for short, 'the Service Commission'). He questions an office order dated 16.01.2014 issued by the Service Commission to the extent it excludes from consideration candidates, who have earned their High School Certificate or equivalent qualification from the National Institute of Open Schooling (for short, 'NIOS'). The petitioner further prays that a mandamus be issued to the Service Commission to treat the petitioner a duly qualified candidate for the post of Technician Grade-II (Fitter), without objection to his High School Certificate being one earned from the NIOS. The petitioner also prays for a mandamus, commanding the respondents to appoint him on the post of Technician Grade-II (Fitter) on the basis of selection held pursuant to Advertisement No. U-37/UPRVUSA/2019, within a period to be stipulated by this Court.
2. The facts giving rise to this petition are these:
^^VsDuhf'k;u Js.kh&f}rh; ¼fQVj½ in gsrq&
ek/;fed f'k{kk ifj"kn mŸkj izns'k dh gkbZ Ldwy foKku ,oa xf.kr fo"k; ds lkFk ;k led{k ijh{kk mŸkh.kZ rFkk fQVVj VªsM esa vf[ky Hkkjrh; jkT; O;ko'kkbd izek.ki=A
DOEACC (orZeku es NIELIT) }kjk iznŸk 80 ?kaVs dk dkslZ vkWu dEI;qVj dkUlsIV (CCC) dk izek.ki= vfHkys[kh; ijh{k.k ds le; izLrqr djuk vfuok;Z gksxkA^^
3. The petitioner says that he belongs to the unreserved category and is qualified for the post in question. He was eligible to apply. The petitioner has passed his Secondary School Certificate Examination, earning that certificate from the NIOS with Science and Mathematics as his subjects. He also holds a National Trade Certificate in the Fitter's Trade. Apart from these, the petitioner also holds a Course on Computer Concepts Certificate (for short, 'CCC Certificate') awarded by the National Institute of Electronics & Information Technology (for short, 'the NIELIT'). The petitioner applied for the post in question, appending copies of his mark-sheets and certificates. The petitioner's application, being found in order, he was allotted Roll No. 11412010252. He was issued with an Admit Card for participating in the Computer Based Test. The Computer Based Test was held on 05.04.2021. The petitioner appeared in the said Test from an Examination Centre at Ghaziabad. The result of the Computer Based Test, declared on 09.09.2021, showed the petitioner as qualified. He was, therefore, called to participate in the document verification scheduled for 18.09.2021.
The petitioner was also issued a separate call letter for participating in the document verification to be held on 18.09.2021. The petitioner says that in accordance with the notice, calling him for participation in the document verification, he appeared for the verification of his documents on the scheduled date, time and venue. At the time of verification, the Trade Certificate held by the petitioner, issued by the Industrial Training Institute (for short, ‘the ITI’) and the CCC Certificate possessed by him, granted by the NIELIT, were accepted, without objection. However, there was objection to the High School Certificate held by the petitioner on ground that the said certificate had been earned by the petitioner from the NIOS, which was a certificate granted under a system of distance learning. It rendered the
State of A.P. v. Lavu Narendranath [(1971) 1 SCC 607 : (1971) 3 SCR 699]
Preeti Srivastava (Dr.) v. State of M.P. [(1999) 7 SCC 120]
State of T.N. v. S.V. Bratheep [(2004) 4 SCC 513]
Vijay Kumar Kushwaha v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2003) 3 UPLBEC 2211
Dr. B.L. Asawa v. State of Rajasthan [(1982) 2 SCC 55 : AIR 1982 SC 933
it is the legal or executive policy of the Government to create post or to prescribe the qualification for the post. The Court or Tribunal is devoid of power to give such direction. The relief sought....
Equivalent Degree – Entitlement for appointment - Candidate who can provide conclusive evidence that he/she has educational qualification or experience at least equal to what is required by the minim....
It is the legal or executive policy of the Government to create post or to prescribe the qualification for the post. The Court or Tribunal is devoid of power to give such direction.
State authorities have broad discretion to set educational qualifications for public service positions, and courts will not interfere unless there are statutory violations.
Higher qualification like B.Ed. (Special Education) not equivalent to prescribed 2-year Diploma unless expressly declared; eligibility strictly per Recruitment Rules as on cut-off date; courts cannot....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.