JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari, J.

1. Heard Sri P.K. Jain, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Atul Dayal, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Utkarsh Birla, learned counsel for the opposite party.

2. By way of present revision, revisionist is assailing the impugned order dated 27.2.2024 passed in S.C.C. Suit No. 7 of 2008 by the Judge, Small Causes Court/ADJ Court No.7, Ghaziabad.

3. Case was heard on 17.5.2024, Court has passed the following order:-

“1. Heard Sri P.K. Jain, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Atul Dayal, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Utkarsh Birla, learned counsel for the opposite party.

2. Sri P.K. Jain, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the revisionists submitted in the present revision impugned order is having two parts; first about the vacation of commercial house in question occupied by the Punjab National Bank Earlier Oriental Bank Of Commerce and second about the decretal amount and enhancement of mesne profit at the rate of 15% per annum.

3. So far first part is