ATTAU RAHMAN MASOODI, AJAI KUMAR SRIVASTAVA I
Mohd. Irfan Siddiqui – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has approached opposite parties for lodging the F.I.R., however no heed has been paid in the matter in question. So, the petitioner has approached this Court with the following main relief:-
3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record as well as taking into consideration the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1, we hereby direct the petitioner to approach opposite party No.1 in respect to the gr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.