Back
SHAMIM AHMED
Anuj Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SHAMIM AHMED, J.
1. Sri Vijay Prakash Tiwari, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 by filing vakalatnama, which is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Devarshi Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Vijay Prakash Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Ms. Ankita Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 30.12.2020, cognizance and summoning order dated 27.07.2021 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow in Case No. 26775 of 2021 (State of U.P. Vs. Anuj Pandey), arising out of Complaint dated 08.06.2020 filed by Respondent No. 2, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow.
4. Today, the applicant, namely, Anuj Pandey and the opposite party no. 2, namely, Ms. Saumya Dwivedi are present before this Court and they have been identified by their respective counsel.
5. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the applicant as well as the opp
The court established that the inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be exercised to quash criminal proceedings in cases of mutual consent, and that the statutory waiting period for divorce u....
The court established that mutual consent and settlement between parties can lead to the quashing of criminal proceedings, and that the statutory waiting period for divorce under Section 13(B) of the....
The court may quash non-compoundable criminal proceedings arising from matrimonial disputes if the parties have reached an amicable settlement.
Dispute is a private and personal affair. The injury sustained does not involve any mental depravity nor amounts to a heinous crime
High Court is required to consider the antecedents of the accused; the conduct of the accused, namely, whether the accused was absconding and why he was absconding, how he had managed with the compla....
Category of offence – Offences under Section 307 IPC and the Arms Act etc. would fall in the category of heinous and serious offences and therefore are to be treated as crime against the society and ....
The High Court can quash non-compoundable offences in matrimonial disputes if the parties have mutually settled their issues, ensuring justice and preventing abuse of the court process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
