JUDGMENT :

SHAMIM AHMED, J.

1. Sri Vijay Prakash Tiwari, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 by filing vakalatnama, which is taken on record.

2. Heard Sri Devarshi Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Vijay Prakash Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Ms. Ankita Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State.

3. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 30.12.2020, cognizance and summoning order dated 27.07.2021 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow in Case No. 26775 of 2021 (State of U.P. Vs. Anuj Pandey), arising out of Complaint dated 08.06.2020 filed by Respondent No. 2, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow.

4. Today, the applicant, namely, Anuj Pandey and the opposite party no. 2, namely, Ms. Saumya Dwivedi are present before this Court and they have been identified by their respective counsel.

5. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the applicant as well as the opp