Back
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Shahnawaz Ali – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Social Welfare Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) :
1. Heard Shri Sanjay Bhasin Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Vipul Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Kuldeep Pati Tripathi, learned counsel for the Additional Advocate General assisted by Shri Vivek Kumar Shukla, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 5, Shri Gaurav Mehrotra and Shri Nirankar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.6.
2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner has made following main prayer:-
The central legal point established in the judgment is that a person with a case based on falsehood has no right to approach the Court, and knowingly producing fabricated and fraudulent documents to ....
The jurisdiction of the Competent Authority to issue a Caste Certificate is determined by the applicant's place of ordinary residence as of the deemed date, and a Caste Certificate issued by the appr....
Caste certificates must be challenged through statutory procedures, not writ petitions; disputes regarding caste status are to be resolved within the framework of the applicable legislation.
Repeated reopening of caste verification proceedings is impermissible when the issue has been examined and closed by competent authorities, ensuring finality in administrative decisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
