VIVEK CHAUDHARY
Paras Nath Anusuchit Prathmik Pathshala Thru. Its Manager Sri Rajesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Social Welfare Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioners, two educational institutions, which are running primary schools, have approached this Court for a mandamus commanding State respondents i.e. Additional Chief Secretary/Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, U.P., Lucknow to issue order for grant-in-aid as per decision dated 20.9.2019 taken by respondent no.1 and by Minister of the department.
2. The facts of case including previous litigation between parties, in brief, are that petitioner nos.1 and 3, which are educational societies established in the years 1971 and 1981 respectively, claimed that their institutions are entitled to be brought under grant-in-aid list. The institutions run by them were in District Gorakhpur, which was later on bifurcated and now institutions are in newly created District Maharajganj. The said institutions were recognized since the years 1982 and 1986 respectively. Since their representations were not being decided, hence, they filed Writ-C No.62957 of 2017 "Committee of Management Shri Paras Nath Anusuchit Prathmik Pathshala and another vs. State of U.P. and others" at Allahabad. The said writ petition was disposed of by order dated 5.1.2018, requiring respond
Modi Entertainment Network v. W.S.G. Cricket Pte. Ltd.
Navinchandra N. Majithia vs. State of Maharashtra and others (2000) 7 SCC 640
Nawal Kishore Sharma vs. Union of India and others (2014) 9 SCC 329
New Horizons Ltd. v. Union of India
Rajendran Chingaravelu vs. R.K. Mishra
S.S. Jain & Co. v. Union of India
Sri Nasiruddin vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal (1975) 2 SCC 671
U.P. Rashtriya Chini Mill Adhikari Parishad
The court emphasized that a dismissal must be proportionate to the misconduct and that procedural violations in disciplinary inquiries can invalidate the outcome.
The principle of forum conveniens requires that parties should adhere to their initial choice of forum when multiple related petitions are pending, to avoid judicial inefficiency and inconvenience.
Education Law - Non-payment of fees - Mere presence of CBSE as a respondent in petition is not sufficient to enable this Court to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution. The Court ma....
The jurisdiction to entertain winding up petitions can reside at Allahabad, despite any technical defects in filing, when no prejudice arises.
The principle of forum non conveniens allows courts to decline jurisdiction if a more appropriate forum exists, particularly in education-related disputes where the School is located outside the cour....
Point of law: In matters relating to transfer of a case from one district to another, it is to be noticed that if the case is pending before a Court which is within the specified area of Oudh only in....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.