SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 1986

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
AJIT KUMAR, J.
Ram Kumar and others – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and others - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 12062 of 2023
Decided on : 09-08-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Atipriya Gautam, Arvind Tripathi and Madhaw Pandey
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

IMPORTANT POINT
The legal principle established is that periods of cancellation of appointments can be counted towards continuity in service and related benefits, as per the relevant Government order.

Headnote:

MANDAMUS - SERVICE BENEFITS - The court addressed the petitioners' request for the Second Promotional Grade/Pay-scale and Assured Career Progression benefits, emphasizing the importance of continuity in service as per the Government order dated 17th February, 2022. The court interpreted this order to mean that the period of cancellation of appointments should be counted towards service benefits, thereby influencing its decision to direct the competent authority to examine the petitioners' grievances.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, constables in the civil police, were appointed in 2005-06, but their appointments were cancelled. After a legal challenge, their appointments were upheld, and they were reinstated. A Government order dated 17th February, 2022, stated that the period of cancellation would count towards continuity in service and related benefits.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners had a valid claim based on the Government order and directed the competent authority to consider their grievances regarding service benefits, including pay fixation and increments.

Issues: Whether the petitioners are entitled to the Second Promotional Grade/Pay-scale and Assured Career Progression benefits considering the period of cancellation of their appointments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Government order clearly provided for the counting of the cancellation period towards continuity in service, which is crucial for determining service benefits.

Result: The petition was disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to examine the petitioners' grievances and issue a reasoned decision within two months.

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Ajit Kumar, J.-Heard Sri Vijay Gautam, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Devesh Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs:

    ''a. Issue, a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus, directing the Respondent Authorities, to pay the Second Promotional Grade/Pay-scale of Sub-Inspector (Grade Pay of Rs. 4200/-) (after calculating the training period) and treating the petitioners continuity in their services, since their initial date of appointment, on account of completion of 16 years services and also to pay the increments & benefits of 7th Pay Commission (Revised Pay-scale) alongwith arrears, in view of the relevant Government Orders, dated 17/02/2022, 21/01/2016, 26/08/2015, 03/03/2015, 05/11/2014 & 21/07/2011 with all consequential benefits.

b. Issue, a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus, directing the Respondent Authorities, to pay the salary of Second Assured Career Progression (ACP) Pay Grade of Sub-Inspector Rs. 4200/- (after calculating the training period) and treating the petitioners continuity in their services, since their initial date of appointment, on account of completion of 16 years service, and also to pay the increments & benefits of 7th Pay Commission (Revised Pay-scale) alongwith arrears, in view of the relevant Government Orders dated 17/02/2022, 21/01/2016, 26/08/2015, 03/03,2015, 05/11/2014 & 21/07/2011 with all consequential benefits.''

3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners, who are constables in the civil police, were appointed in the year 2005-06 but all such appointments were cancelled and cancellation order became subject-matter of challenge before this Court and then in appeal before the Supreme Court. After the appointments were upheld petitioners were reinstated like other constables and Government issued a Government order dated 17th February, 2022, wherein vide Clause 3(1) it provided that period during which appointment of such employees remained cancelled would count towards their continuity in service, seniority and other service benefits like pay fixation, pay revision and also post retirement dues. Clause 3(1) of the Government order dated 17th February, 2022 is reproduced hereunder:

4. It is submitted that in above regard petitioners have already represented the matter before the competent authority on 13th May, 2023, a copy whereof has also been brought on record as Annexure-16 to the writ petition.

5. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the matter can be directed to be examined by the competent authority in the first instance.

6. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2 to look into and consider the grievance of the petitioner in reference to the Government order dated 17th February, 2022 referred to hereinabove and dispose of same strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months' time from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

7. Needless to add that the order to be passed by the authority, shall be reasoned and speaking one.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top