SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1550

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Babu Lal - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Anr. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 13621 of 2021
Decided On : 02-12-2021

The court emphasized the importance of deciding the petitioner's representation in accordance with the law.

Headnote:

ACP - Pension Dispute - The court directed the respondent to decide the petitioner's representation for the grant of second ACP and restructuring of pension within eight weeks.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought directions to grant second ACP benefit and restructure the pension in the correct grade-pay of Assistant-Sub-Inspector.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the respondent to decide the petitioner's representation within eight weeks.

Issues: Dispute over the grant of second ACP and restructuring of pension.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for the respondent to decide the petitioner's representation in accordance with the law.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent to decide the petitioner's representation within eight weeks.

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. - By way of the present petition, Petitioner seeks directions to the Respondents to grant second Assured Career Progression (hereinafter referred to as ACP) benefit on completion of twenty four years of regular service and to restructure the pension in the requisite and correct grade-pay of Assistant-Sub-Inspector as well as to grant the consequential benefits, including arrears of pension as per the correct rank of Assistant-Sub-Inspector instead of Head-Constable.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner retired as a Head Constable from CISF on 30th April, 2005 after serving for thirty years, one month and twenty five days. He states that the Respondents have wrongly fixed the pension of the petitioner in the incorrect grade pay of Head Constable instead of the applicable and correct grade pay of Assistant Sub-Inspector. He states that this is in direct violation of the ACP which categorically grants the benefit of first ACP after regular service of twelve years and second ACP after a regular service of twenty four years.

3. A perusal of the paperbook reveals that the petitioner has submitted a representation through his counsel dated 1st August, 2021 to the respondent-Department. However, the same has not been decided by the Department till date.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the petitioners representation dated 1st August, 2021 by way of a reasoned order in accordance with law within eight weeks.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top