Babu Lal vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Babu Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. pension fixation and acp benefits violation (Para 1 , 2)
2. pending representation requires response (Para 3)
3. decision on representation mandated (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J.: (Oral)--By way of the present petition, Petitioner seeks directions to the Respondents to grant second Assured Career Progression (hereinafter referred to as `ACP') benefit on completion of twenty four years of regular service and to restructure the pension in the requisite and correct grade-pay of Assistant-Sub-Inspector as well as to grant the consequential benefits, including arrears of pension as per the correct rank of Assistant-Sub- Inspector instead of Head-Constable.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner retired as a Head Constable from CISF on 30th April, 2005 after serving for thirty years, one month and twenty five days. He states that the Respondents have wrongly fixed the pension of the petitioner in the incorrect grade pay of Head Constable instead of the applicable and correct grade pay of Assistant Sub-Inspector. He states that this is in direct violation of the ACP which categorically grants the benefit of first ACP after regular service of tw

Click Here to Read the rest of this document