IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Saumitra Dayal Singh, Manjive Shukla, JJ.
Santosh Kumar Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and others - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 11335 of 2022
Decided On : 17-01-2024
NOC - Petroleum Retail Outlet - Explosives Act 1884 - The court interpreted the provisions of the Explosives Act regarding the issuance of a No-Objection-Certificate (NOC) for establishing a petroleum retail outlet, emphasizing that criminal history should not disqualify an applicant if not specified in the eligibility criteria.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the rejection of their application for a No-Objection-Certificate (NOC) to establish a petroleum retail outlet, citing pending criminal cases but no convictions.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the denial of the NOC based on the petitioner's criminal history was erroneous, as the eligibility for the outlet was determined by HPCL, not the civil authorities.
Issues: Whether the existence of pending criminal cases against the petitioner can justify the denial of a No-Objection-Certificate for establishing a petroleum retail outlet.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the criteria for issuing an NOC do not include the applicant's criminal history, which is irrelevant to the suitability of the site for a petroleum retail outlet.
Result: The petition is allowed, and the impugned orders are set aside, directing the District Magistrate to reconsider the NOC application.
JUDGMENT :
Reply to the personal affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Neeraj Shukla alongwith Sri Prabhakar Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri M.K. Maurya, holding brief of Sri Nishant Mehrotra, learned counsel for respondent Corporation and Sri Arimardan Singh Rajput, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
3. Challenge has been raised to the order dated 29.3.2022 rejecting the petitioner's application to be issued a No-Objection-Certificate (NOC in short) to establish a petroleum retail outlet at Village & Post - Unchgaon, Tehsil - Machhalishahar on Shahganj - Prayagraj SH-7 Road, District - Jaunpur, U.P.
4. Undisputedly, the petitioner has been selected by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL in short) to establish the above described petroleum retail outlet. Letter of Intent (LOI in short) has also been issued in favour of the petitioner by HPCL, on 6.3.2020. Almost four years have passed since then. Petitioner has not been able to establish the petroleum retail outlet, primarily, owing to non-completion of formalities by the civil authorities. In that, the petitioner applied for grant of NOC by respondent No. 2/District Magistrate, Jaunpur. It was not issued to the petitioner.
5. Presently, upon earlier petition filed, the impugned order has been passed. NOC claimed by the petitioner has been denied, primarily for reasons of four criminal cases lodged against the petitioner. In his defence, the petitioner states, he has not been convicted in any of the four cases. All trials are pending. The petitioner has been enlarged on bail and is complying with the terms of such bail orders. As to the basis of allegations, it has been clarified, the petitioner had contested the election of Gram Pradhan. Arising from that, false criminal cases have been lodged against him.
6. In any case, it has been submitted, the existence of criminal cases against the petitioner may have no bearing on the NOC applied for by the petitioner. Referring to the Government Order No. 632 dated 4.2.2021, it has been submitted, the proforma for issuance of NOC nowhere provides disqualification occasioned by registration of criminal case against the allottee of the petroleum corporation. The conditions specified on the form of the NOC reads as below:
HINDI IMAGE
7. Referring to the last clause HINDI IMAGE, it has been submitted, that clause pertains to impact on public security by establishment of petroleum retail outlet at any particular site. It has no nexus or bearing on the status of the applicant.
8. The stand taken by the petitioner has been duly supported by learned counsel for HPCL.
9. On the other hand, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has submitted, if the NOC is issued to a person having a criminal history, public safety and security would stand compromised. Therefore, NOC has been rightly denied.
10. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, while we do not propose to lay down any law as to the eligibility of a person to establish and run a petroleum retail outlet, what requires consideration in the present case is whether the petitioner is entitled to be issued a NOC by the state authorities.
11. Undisputedly, the NOC required to be issued by the state authorities has no bearing on the eligibility of the petitioner to be allotted petroleum retail outlet. That eligibility arises on the strength of eligibility conditions prescribed by HPCL. There is no lis between the parties that the HPCL has found the petitioner eligible to establish the petroleum retail outlet. Not only the petitioner has been selected to establish such outlet but the letter of intent has been issued.
12. On the other hand, NOC is necessary to be issued by the state authorities, primarily, because a petroleum retail outlet falls within the cover of the Explosives Act 1884. Being highly inflammable and hazardous, it requires specialized handling. Petroleum retail outlet may be e
AI
Criminal history does not disqualify an applicant for a No-Objection-Certificate if not specified in the eligibility criteria, as determined by the relevant authority.
The court established that the mere pendency of a criminal case cannot justify the denial of a No Objection Certificate under the Petroleum Rules.
Pendency of criminal cases cannot justify refusal of No Objection Certificate; presumption of innocence is a fundamental principle.
The court establishes that local objections are not material for NOC applications under Rule 144 of the Petroleum Rules, 2002.
The issuance of an NOC prior to the filing of a writ petition removes grounds for contesting its validity.
Compliance with legal and environmental protocols in NOC issuance mitigates objections raised regarding safety and compliance with guidelines.
There is no statutory prohibition against establishing retail outlets near residential areas if safety norms are met.
The definition of protected works in petroleum regulations does not encompass fireworks shops, allowing for the establishment of petroleum outlets under specific distances.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.