SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1363

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SIDDHARTHA VARMA, RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, JJ.
Anil Tuteja – Petitioner
Versus
Station House Officer and Others – Respondents
Criminal Misc. Writ Petition Nos. 6194, 6195, 6236, 7389 of 2024
Decided On : 04-10-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Saksham Srivastava, Vinayak Mithal, Anurag Kumar Ojha, Ishan Deo Giri, Imran Ullah, Mohammad Khalid.
For the Respondents: Jitendra Prasad Mishra, Pawan Kumar Srivastava.

The court affirmed that even if a prosecution complaint is quashed, information under Section 66(2) of the PML Act can justify the lodging of an FIR, as it discloses cognizable offences.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 420, 468, 471, 473, 484, 120-B; Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Section 66(2) - Quashing of FIR - Petitioners challenged FIR registered against them alleging fraud in the liquor tender process, claiming it was based on statements rendered null due to a prior quashing of the prosecution complaint by the Supreme Court - The issues of admissibility of statements under PMLA and jurisdiction for lodging FIR are addressed by the court. (Paras 5, 18, 28)

(B) FIR - Grounds for quashing - Court rules that FIR cannot be quashed as it discloses a cognizable offence and findings from investigations support allegations against petitioners - No material to indicate malafide intent of the Enforcement Directorate in communicating information that led to the FIR. (Paras 24, 30)

Facts of the case:
Multiple petitioners challenged an FIR lodged by U.P. police, containing allegations of fraud and tampering related to a liquor supply contract, claiming it was based on invalid statements - Earlier, a connected prosecution complaint was quashed by the Supreme Court.

Findings of Court:
The court dismissed writ petitions as the FIR disclosed cognizable offences and supported claims made by the Enforcement Directorate about fraudulent activities by the petitioners related to illegal hologram production.

Issues: The key issues included the admissibility of statements made under the PMLA, the impact of a prior quashing of a prosecution complaint, and the jurisdiction of the U.P. police to file an FIR based on the information provided by the ED.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that even after the quashing of the prosecution complaint, information collected could form a valid basis for an FIR; the communication sent by ED under Section 66(2) of the PML Act was legitimate and actionable.

Result: Writ petitions dismissed.

Table of Content
1. filing of writ petitions with specific prayers. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. judicial scrutiny of fir basis and related communications. (Para 5 , 8 , 10 , 25)
3. arguments regarding the validity of evidence obtained under pml act. (Para 6 , 14 , 15 , 20 , 21)
4. quashed prosecution complaint's implications on fir validity. (Para 9 , 19 , 27)
5. dismissal of writ petitions citing established cognizable offences. (Para 30 , 31)

JUDGMENT :

SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.

1. Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 6236 of 2024 (Anil Tuteja vs. Station House Officer & Ors.) has been filed with the following prayers:

    “(A) Issue appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the FIR dated 30.7.2023 bearing FIR No. 196/2023 dated 30.7.2023 u/s 420, 468, 471, 473, 484, 120-B IPC PS Kasna, District Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh (“Impugned FIR”) registered by the Respondent No. 1 and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom.

    (B) Issue appropriate writ, order or direction to stay the operation and effect of the FIR dated 30.7.2023 bearing FIR No. 196/2023 dated 30.7.2023 u/s 420, 468, 471, 473, 484, 120-B IPC PS Kasna, District Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh (“Impugned FIR”) registered by the Respondent No. 1 and all investigations and proceedings emanating therefrom.

    (C) Issue appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the Impugned Letter dated 28.07.2023 along with all consequential actions and proceedings emanating therefrom as being illegal and in contempt of the Orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.”

2. Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 6194 of 2024 (Anwar Dhebar vs. State of U.P. & Ors.) has been filed with the following prayers:

    “(I) Issue appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the FIR dated 30.7.2023 bearing FIR No. 196/2023 dated 30.7.2023 u/s 420, 468, 471, 473, 484, 120-B IPC PS Kasna, District Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh (“Impugned FIR”) registered by the Respondent No. 3 and all consequential actions/proceedings/ investigations emanating therefrom.

    (II) Issue appropriate writ, order or direction to stay the operation and effect of the FIR dated 30.7.2023 bearing FIR No. 196/2023 dated 30.7.2023 u/s 420, 468, 471, 473, 484, 120-B IPC PS Kasna, District Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh (“Impugned FIR”) registered by the Respondent No. 3 and all actions/ investigations and proceedings emanating therefrom.

    (III) Issue appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the Impugned Letter dated 28.07.2023 along with all consequential actions/proceedings/investigations emanating therefrom as being illegal and in violation of the Orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.”

3. Similarly, Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 6195 of 2024 (Arun Pati Tripathi vs. State of U.P. & Ors.) has been filed with the following prayers:

    “(I) Issue appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the FIR dated 30.7.2023 bearing FIR No. 196/2023 dated 30.7.2023 u/s 420, 468, 471, 473, 484, 120-B IPC PS Kasna, District Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh (“Impugned FIR”) registered by the Respondent No. 3 and all consequential actions/proceedings/ investigations emanating therefrom.

    (II) Issue appropriate writ, order or direction to stay the operation and effect of the FIR dated 30.7.2023 bearing FIR No. 196/2023 dated 30.7.2023 u/s 420, 468, 471, 473, 484, 120-B IPC PS Kasna, District Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh (“Impugned FIR”) registered by the Respondent No. 3 and all actions/ investigations and proceedings emanating therefrom.

    (III) Issue appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the Impugned Letter dated 28.07.2023 along with all consequential actions/proceedings/investigations emanating therefrom as being illegal and in violation of the Orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.”

4. Niranjan Das, another accused in the First Information Report which has been impugned in the above writ petitions, has filed Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 7389 of 2024 and the prayers made in the writ petition are as follows:

    “(A) Issue appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the FIR bearing Ca

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      Judicial Analysis

      AI

      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top