SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2501

CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Satendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sanjay Kumar Mishra
For the Respondent: C.S.C

JUDGMENT

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

Heard Mr. Anil Bhushan, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents.

2. Brief facts of the case are that late Mahboob Ali was bhumidhar with transferable right of Khasara No.19 area 1-10- 0 Bigha, Khasara No.20 area 0-13-0 Bigha Khasara No.21 area 0-9-0 Bigha, Khasra No.22 area 1-15-0 Bigha situated in village-Salarpur, Pargana and Tehsil-Dadri, District-Gautam Budh Nagar. After death of Mahboob Ali his heirs namely Sarjeet, Jaljeet and Charni were recorded in the revenue record. After death of Surjeet his heirs Dalip, Rati Ram, Bheem and Rajpal were recorded. After death of Dalip, legal heirs Rajendra (petitioner No.2), Virendra, Davendra and Satendra (petitioner No.1) were recorded as his heirs and legal representative. Charni had executed sale deed regarding his share on 19.10.1983 in favour of respondent No.4 but Sarjeet or his heirs had not executed any sale deed in favour of respondent No.4. Collector Ghaziabad passed an order dated 07.04.1993 vesting the land purchased by respondent No.4 in State in the proceeding Under Section-154 (2)/167 (2) of U.P.Z.A an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top