SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2500

CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Dilawar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ratnesh Kumar Pandey
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Sunil Kumar Singh

ORDER

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

Order on C.M. Impleadment Application No.2 of 2023

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. In view of the facts mentioned in the application supported by the affidavit, the instant application is allowed.

3. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to implead the Gaon Sabha as respondent No.5 in the writ petition during the course of the day.

Order on Writ Petition

4. Heard Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Pandey, Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents and Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Counsel for Gaon Sabha.

5. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:

    (i) issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus restraining the respondents from interfering in peaceful possession of the petitioner over the land in dispute belonging to Khasara No.573, situated in village-Soharakha Jahidabad, Tehsil and Pergana-Dadari, District-Gautam Budh Nagar in any manner, whatsoever, except in accordance with law till disposal of his application dated 19.02.2021 by the respondent No.2 with a further direction to the respondent No.2 to decide application of the petitioner dated 19.02.2021 filed in Suit No.03 of 1987-88, u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top