Back
CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Ravindra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Chandra Kumar Rai, J.
Heard Mr. Rafiuddin Ansari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anjani Kumar Chaurasia, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. Brief facts of the case are that due to non payment of maintenance amount awarded under section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the petitioner, the sale of agriculture holding of petitioner took place on 27.10.2005 under the order of Civil Judge (J.D.) Tilhar, Shahjahanpur dated 17.12.2004/22.7.2005, accordingly, sale certificate was issued on 2.9.2008 in favour of respondent no. 5. Petitioner filed an objection against the sale took place on 27.10.2005 under Rule 285-I of U.P Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Rules 1952 (hereinafter referred to as "U.P.Z.A & L.R Rules"). The aforementioned objection was registered as objection No. 35 of 2005-2006 before respondent No 3/Commissioner, Bareilly Division, Bareilly and the same was dismissed as not maintainable vide order dated 14.11.2007 passed by respondent No. 3. Petitioner challenged the order dated 14.11.2007 by way of revision before respondent No 2/Board of Revenue, which was dismissed vide order dated 18.3.2008, hence thi
Failure to pay maintenance can lead to lawful execution proceedings, including property sale, with objections to such sales dismissed if not maintainable.
The court affirmed that an auction sale confirmation under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules is final after 30 days, barring any objections, and cannot be revoked by the confirming ....
The court reiterated that admissions in a written statement regarding property transactions create binding effects on claims of ownership, thereby restricting contesting rights based on previously es....
The court affirmed that failure to comply with prior court orders and the finality of executed sale deeds limit the ability to contest auction proceedings under the Land Revenue Code.
The court held that interim relief should be granted in land disputes pending regularization, emphasizing that statutory rights are to be protected until final determination.
Sale deed executed under statutory permission remains valid despite allegations of fraud, provided conditions were adequately met per the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act.
Mutation orders based on valid sale deeds remain effective despite ongoing civil disputes; judicial review under the U.P. Land Revenue Act is limited to clear illegality.
Mandatory compliance with Rule 285-E of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 is essential for the validity of auction sales.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
