SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2210

CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Vijendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ashutosh Pandey.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

Table of Content
1. background of sale deed execution and permissions. (Para 2)
2. petitioner's claim of fraud and lack of permission. (Para 3)
3. state's defense on validity of sale deed. (Para 4)
4. court's analysis on facts and legal provisions. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9)
5. court's emphasis on facts established regarding payment and permissions. (Para 7)
6. writ petition dismissed based on findings. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

Heard Mr. Ashutosh Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Abhishek Shukla learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner moved an application under Section 157 -A U.P.Z.A.&.L.R. Act for permission to execute the sale deed in respect to plot No.150/2 area 1.511 hectare of Khata No.595 situated in Village- Azamganj Madiya, Pargana, Tehsil and District-Badaun, which was registered as application No.72/2000-2001 District Magistrate vide order dated 8.8.2001 granted permission to the petitioner for execution of sale deed in respect to plot number 150/2, area 1.511 hectare. Petitioner executed the sale deed on 10.8.2001 in pursuance of the permission granted on 8-8-2001 in favour of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top