JUDGMENT :

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Surendra Kumar Chaubey as well as Sri V.S. Parmar, learned Counsel for the contesting respondent nos. 3 to 6 and Sri Shashi Kant Kushwaha, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2. Brief facts of the case are that proceedings was initiated under Section 198 (2) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 hereinafter referred to as U.P..A. & L.R. Act before the District Magistrate, Hamirpur on the application dated 01.10.1975 filed by the petitioner in respect to lease executed in favour of respondent nos. 3 to 6. The aforementioned application was rejected vide order dated 23.11.1976 recording finding of fact that lease was executed in favour of respondent nos. 3 to 6 in accordance with provisions of the Act and Rules framed thereunder. Against the order dated 23.11.1976 a revision was filed before the Board of Revenue, which was registered as Revision under Section 229 (z) of 1976-77. The aforementioned revision was heard and dismissed by Board of Revenue vide order dated 18.06.1984. Hence this writ petition for the following reliefs:-

(i) Issue a writ in the nature of c