SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2205

CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Ijlasi Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ram Bachan Yadav.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

Mr. L.K. Tripathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has placed the instruction before the Court in compliance of the order of this Court dated 13.1.2023 which is taken on record.

2. Heard Mr. Ram Bachan Yadav, Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. L.K. Tripathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

3. The instant petition has been filed for mandamus commanding the respondent No.4 to restore the house of the petitioner in its previous position which has been demolished in part by the authorities in spite of the pendency of civil suit before the Civil Court as well as the proceeding pending before the Revisional Court. It is also prayed that necessary action be taken against the authorities who have illegally demolished the the petitioner's construction in part without conducting legal procedure.

4. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner is bhoomidhar of plot No. 2043 area 0.0080 hectare and house is situated over the same. Private respondent No.8 is the owner of adjacent plot 1950. Civil suit No. 892 of 2022 was filed by petitioner for injunction impleading private-respondent No.8 Bacchu as defendant. In the afo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top