SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2239

DINESH PATHAK
Gulfam – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Sudhir Kumar (Chandraul), Rafiqa Anees Khan.
For the Opposite Party : G.A., Mohd. Afzal, Shahrukh.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Pathak, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2, learned AGA and perused the record on board.

2. The present applicant has invoked the inherent power of this Court under Section 482 CrPC assailing the orders dated 6.1.2023 and 25.1.2023 passed by the trial court while rejecting the miscellaneous applications moved on behalf of the present accused-applicant in case No. 1827 of 2020 ( Jafar Alam v. Gulfam ), under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act (in brevity, 'N.I. Act').

3. Facts culled out from the record are that respondent No. 2 has moved a complaint dated 12.4.2018 under section 138 of N.I. Act with respect to dishonour of cheque being No. 007708 dated 22.12.2017 amounting to Rs. 4,00,000/-. Learned trial court, after considering the contents of the complaint and the statements of the witnesses, has issued the summoning order. During pendency of the case, the present applicant (accused) has moved an application dated 12.2.2021 under section 82 of N.I. Act with an averment that entire cheque amount i.e. Rs. 4,00,000/- has been paid, therefore, the complaint may be rejected and compensation to the tune of Rs. 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top