SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2226

DINESH PATHAK
Shailesh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Shivajee Srivastava, Shrikant Singh Yadav
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Pathak, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and perused the record.

2. The applicant has invoked the inherent power of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the summoning order dated 24.10.2021, passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Azamgarh, in complaint case No.1136 of 2021 (Hemant Yadav v. Shailesh Yadav) under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act (in brevity "NI Act"), Police Station - Pawai, District - Azamgarh.

3. It is submitted that respondent no.2 has moved a complaint dated 04.08.2021 with an averment that the accused (applicant herein) has borrowed money amounting to Rs. 1, 90, 000/- from the complainant and in lieu thereof he has furnished four cheques with the following details :

    (i) Cheque No.047690, dated 4.4.2021 amounting to Rs. 50, 000/-

    (ii) Cheque No.047691, dated 5.4.2021 amounting to Rs. 50, 000/-

    (iii) Cheque No.047692, dated 7.4.2021 amounting to Rs. 40, 000/-

    (iv) Cheque No.047693, dated 6.4.2021 amounting to Rs. 50, 000/-

4. While the aforesaid cheques were represented by the complainant in his bank account, same have been bounced with an endorsement for want of sufficient fund. Learned counsel for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top