Sushil Kumar vs Board of Revenue, U. P. , Allahabad

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 2357

JAYANT BANERJI
Sushil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue, U. P. , Allahabad – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Deepak Kumar Jaiswal.
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Hari Narayan Singh.

Table of Content
1. sufficient notice received by respondents. (Para 1)
2. joint representation of petitioners and respondents. (Para 2 , 3)
3. petitioners argue procedural unfairness and lack of knowledge. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
4. court scrutinizes claims of the petitioners. (Para 8 , 9)
5. court affirms board's decision; no interference warranted. (Para 10 , 11)
6. writ petition dismissed with no relief. (Para 12)

JUDGMENT

Jayant Banerji, J.

The office report of 5.4.2023 is that notice was issued to the respondent nos. 3, 4, 5, 6/1, 8, 10, 11,12/1, 12/2, 13/1, 13/2 by registered post with acknowledgement due fixing 10.3.2022. The service report is that the respondent nos. 3, 4, 5, 6/1, 8, 11,12/1, 13/1, 13/2 have refused to accept the registered notice. Further it is mentioned that with regard to the respondent nos. 10 and 12/2, neither the undelivered cover nor acknowledgement has been received yet. As such, notices on respondent nos. 3, 4, 5, 6/1, 8, 10, 11,12/1, 12/2, 13/1, 13/2 are deemed sufficient.

2. Heard Shri Deepak Kumar Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel appears for the respondent nos. 1, 2 and 15. Respondent no. 14 is represented by Shri H.N.