SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2306

JYOTSNA SHARMA
Divya Nand Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants : Ram Kishore Pandey
For the Respondents: G.A.,Janardan Yadav

Table of Content
1. complaint case and alleged facts. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding the falsity of the complaint. (Para 4)
3. judicial approach on summoning accused. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. criteria for prima facie satisfaction. (Para 10 , 14)
5. concerns over judicial procedure and related cases. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
6. conclusion: insufficient material to summon. (Para 15)

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma, J.

Heard Sri Ram Kishore Pandey, learned counsel for the appellants, Sri Janardan Yadav, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 and Sri O.P. Mishra, learned AGA for the State.

2. By means of this criminal appeal, an order dated 09.11.2022 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Azamgarh in complaint case no. 131 of 2021 (Prem Kumar v. Dr. Divya Nand Yadav and Others), Police Station Jiyanpur, District Azamgarh, whereby the appellant accused persons have been summoned under Sections 323 , 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(da) and 3(1)(dha) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, is under challenge.

3. The relevant facts as emerging from record are as below:-

    The complainant Prem Kumar filed an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. against the present revisionists with the allegat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top