MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, MANISH KUMAR NIGAM
Srinath – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Notice on behalf of respondent no. 1 has been accepted by the office of learned Additional Solicitor General of India and by Shri Mahendra Pratap on behalf of respondent no. 4. Shri R. K.Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel is present for the respondent nos. 2, 3 & 5.
2. The case of the petitioners is that their land was acquired by NHAI and an award was also made. The petitioners have received compensation but the rehabilitation and resettlement award has not been made as per the Second Schedule to the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. It has, therefore, been prayed that the respondents be directed to make rehabilitation and resettlement award as per provisions of the Act, 2013.
3. The claim of the petitioners is similar to the one raised in Writ C No. 2782 of 2023 (Ashok Kumar and 8 others v. National Highway Authority of India and 3 others), which was disposed of by this Court, by order dated 24.2.2023 in terms of the order passed in Writ C No. 21601 of 2022 (Ranvir Singh and 35 others v. National Highway Authority of India and Competent Authority For Land Acquisition and Others). The operative part of
The competent authority under the National Highways Act is responsible for declaring rehabilitation and resettlement awards, not the district Collector, as per the provisions of the Right to Fair Com....
The competent authority under the National Highways Act is responsible for rehabilitation and resettlement awards, as defined by the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, R....
The competent authority under the National Highways Act, 1956 is responsible for declaring rehabilitation and resettlement awards, not the district Collector, as per the provisions of the Right to Fa....
The provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013, apply to land acquisitions under the National Highways Act, requiring a detailed examination of indivi....
An appeal under Section 74 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act cannot challenge awards issued under the National Highways Act, 1956.
Petitioners can obtain no cause for concern or apprehension, as impelled by them in this writ petition, because if they are to seek enhancement of the amounts under the Award as per Section 3G of the....
The District Collector must specify entitlement under the RFCTLARR Act when denying rehabilitation and resettlement compensation, irrespective of prior compensation under the NH Act.
Denial of rehabilitation and resettlement compensation under RFCTLARR Act was improper as it did not confirm eligibility despite prior compensation under the NH Act.
The court emphasized that past compensation does not preclude a party from claiming separate rehabilitation and resettlement compensation under the RFCTLARR Act, necessitating explicit evaluation of ....
Point of Law – NHAI, or the other competent Authority, is at liberty to act as per Section 3E of the "NH Act" while taking possession of the acquired properties, notwithstanding the pendancy of the a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.