SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2321

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 
Ashwani Kumar Mishra, Jayant Banerji, JJ.
Smt. Asha Rani - Petitioner
Vs.
Union Of India And Others - Respondent
WRIT - C No. - 10962 of 2025
Decided On :15-04-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sanjay Kumar Mishra
For the Respondent: A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Pranjal Mehrotra

The competent authority under the National Highways Act is responsible for rehabilitation and resettlement awards, as defined by the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act.

Headnote:(A) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Sections 3(c), 23, 31, and 34-36 - National Highways Act, 1956 - The petitioner sought rehabilitation and resettlement award following land acquisition by NHAI, claiming non-compliance with the Act, 2013. The court directed the competent authority to prepare an award proposal as per the Second Schedule of the Act, ensuring timely completion. (Paras 2, 9, 10, 11)

(B) Jurisdiction - The court clarified that the competent authority, as defined under the NH Act, holds the power to declare awards, not the district Collector. (Paras 5, 6, 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner’s land was acquired by NHAI, receiving compensation but lacking a rehabilitation award per the Act, 2013. Similar claims were previously addressed by the court.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the competent authority to examine claims for rehabilitation and resettlement in accordance with the provisions of the Act, 2013.

Issues: The main issues were the authority responsible for declaring the rehabilitation award and compliance with the provisions of the Act, 2013.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the competent authority under the NH Act is responsible for rehabilitation and resettlement awards, clarifying the role of the Collector and the application of the Act, 2013.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. petitioner claims lack of rehabilitation award post land acquisition. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner seeks similar relief as in previous judgments. (Para 3 , 4)
3. competent authority under nh act is responsible for awards. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT :

Jayant Banerji, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondent no.2, NHAI and Shri Rajiv Gupta, learned counsel for the State-respondent. Shri Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal appears for the respondent no.1.

2. The case of the petitioner is that his land was acquired by NHAI and an award was also made. The petitioner has received compensation but the rehabilitation and resettlement award has not been made as per the Second Schedule to the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. It has, therefore, been prayed that the respondents be directed to make rehabilitation and resettlement award as per provisions of the Act, 2013.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim of the petitioner is similar to the one raised in Writ C No.2782 of 2023 ( Ashok Kumar and 8 others vs. National Highway Authority of India and 3 others ), which was disposed of by this Court, by order dated 24.2.2023 in terms of the order passed in Writ C No.21601 of 2022 ( Ranvir Singh and 35 others vs. National Highway Authority of India and Competent Authority For Land Acquisition and Others ). The operative part of the order passed in Writ C No.2782 of 2023 ( Ashok Kumar and 8 others vs. National Highway Authority of India and 3 others ), dated 24.2.2023 is as follows :-

"9. Lastly the writ petitions have been disposed of with the following directions:-

"For the above, without entering into the merits of the claim of the petitioner, it is directed that the competent authority under the National Highways Act, 1956 shall prepare a proposal for the rehabilitation and resettlement award for affected families, within the meaning of Section 3(c) of the Act, 2013, in terms of the entitlements provided in the Second Schedule, with the assistance of the officers of the NHAI and submit the same before the Collector for making award in accordance with the provisions of Section 31 of the RECTLARR Act, 2013.

For preparation of the said proposal, the competent authority shall make necessary enquiry as per the provisions of the Sections 34, 35 and 36 of the RECTLARR Act, 2013 as contained in Chapter V of the Act, 2013, i.e before preparation of the rehabilitation and resettlement award, in relation to the acquisition in question.

It goes without saying that the representatives of the National Highways Authority and the affected tenure holders are entitled to participate in the proceedings for preparation of the award. The claim of the petitioners herein for the entitlements under the Second Schedule at serial no. (1) for provision of housing unit in case of displacement; serial no. (4) choice of annuity and employment and serial no. (10), one time resettlement allowance, shall be specifically considered by the competent authority in making such an award.

The entire exercise shall be completed, as expeditious as possible, preferably, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

We may make it clear that, at this stage, no direction has been given for providing benefits of Third Schedule as no such demand has been raised by the petitioners herein.

In any case, while making such an award, independent consideration shall be given to the elements of rehabilitation and resettlement entitlements for the affected families provided in the Second Schedule, without being influenced by any of the observations made hereinabove."

10. The petitioners herein are similarly situated and, therefore, are entitled for the same relief.

11. The present writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of."

4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the instant petition be also disposed of in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top