SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2257

RAJAN ROY, MANISH KUMAR
Jagjit Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Yogesh Chandra Srivastava
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Rajan Roy, J.

On 29.03.2023 we had passed the following order:

    "Learned Standing Counsel prays for and is granted ten days' time to seek instructions whether opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner under Section 74 of the G.S.T. Act, 2017.

    List this case on 10.04.2023, as fresh."

2. Learned Additional C.S.C. does not have instructions, we, therefore, proceed to hear the matter.

3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record what we find is that a show cause notice dated 10.06.2021 was issued to the petitioner for the tax period April, 2018-March, 2019 under section 74 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017. In the said notice, it was mentioned that the petitioner may appear before the said undersigned for personal hearing either in person or through authorized representative for representing its case on the date, time and venue if mentioned in table below. In the table mentioned in the show cause notice, last date for submission of reply was given as 12 July, 2021 but no date, time or venue mentioned for personal hearing. The petitioner admittedly did not submit any reply by 12th July, 2021 instead as pointed out by the petitioner's counsel on 10th Ju

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top