SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2828

PANKAJ BHATIA
Santosh Traders – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sachin Srivastava
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

Table of Content
1. legality of demand under gst with respect to principles of natural justice. (Para 2 , 5)
2. procedural irregularities in the issuance of show cause notice. (Para 3 , 4)
3. violation of natural justice leads to quashing of the order. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

Pankaj Bhatia, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material brought on record.

2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 14.07.2021 passed against the petitioner, whereby demand has been quantified and imposed against the petitioner as disclosed in the said order for the period April 2018 to March 2019 in respect of SGST and CGST respectively along with tax and penalty imposed upon the petitioner as well as the order 26.12.2022 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed on the ground of the same being beyond the prescribed period of limitation prescribed under Section 107 of the GST Act.

3. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner was served a show cause notice under Section 74 of the GST Act recording that it has come to the knowledge of the authority issuing a notice that the tax was not being paid or short paid or th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top