SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2294

MANISH MATHUR
Jitendra Devi Pandey Stamp – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Bajrangi Verma.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT

Manish Mathur, J.

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.

2. Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 13th of September, 2011 passed under Section 47A of Indian STAMP ACT , 1899 as well as the order dated 27th of July, 2012 passed in Appeal under Section 56 of the Act.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the property in question which is immovable in nature was leased out to one Smt. Neera Khanna W/o Sri. Mahendra Singh Khanna by means of registered lease deed dated 10th March, 1995 executed by the Uttar Pradesh Avash and Vikas Parisad, Lucknow for a period of 30 years. She transferred the lease hold rights by means of assig

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top