SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2305

MANISH MATHUR
Baccha Khan – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Ayukt Mahoday Allahabad Mandal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Onkar Nath Pandey,S.M Royekwar.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Manish Mathur, J.

Heard Shri S.M. Singh Royekwar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned State Counsel appearing for the opposite parties.

2. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging order dated 18.11.2006 passed under Section 47A of the STAMP ACT , 1899 (for short 'the Act') whereby instrument of transfer dated 16.4.2003 has been found to be undervalued while finding property to be residential in nature although stamp duty as per agricultural rate has been deposited. Also under challenge is order dated 9.10.2007 rejecting recall application as well as order dated 11.8.2008 passed by revisional authority in Revision No.1 of 2007 under Section 56 of the Act.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that perusal of impugned orders will make it evident that the same are completely non-speaking in nature and neither the objection filed by petitioner in proceeding under Section 47-A of the Act nor submissions in the memorandum of the revision have been considered by either of the authorities. It is submitted that in fact orders passed are clearly ex parte in nature and are based on an alleged spot inspection report, which a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top