SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2295

MANISH MATHUR
Bharat Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mohan Singh.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

Table of Content
1. challenge to stamp duty orders based on property classification. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments against reliance on spot inspection reports. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's emphasis on procedural errors in inspection. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. delay in inspections undermines their relevance. (Para 12 , 13)
5. impugned orders violate statutory and judicial principles. (Para 14)
6. judgment allows writ petition and sets aside previous orders. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

Manish Mathur, J.

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties.

2. Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 28th March, 2018 passed under Section 47A of STAMP ACT 1899 as well as order dated 11th December, 2019 passed under Section 56 of the Act in appeal whereby additional stamp duty has been imposed upon petitioner with regard to two of the plots purchased by him by means of deed of transfer dated 22nd August 2015, which has been treated to be residential in nature although it has been indicated as agriculture in instrument of transfer.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that by means of sale deed dated 22nd August, 2015, portions of fou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top