SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2292

MANISH MATHUR
Seema – Appellant
Versus
Chief Controller Revenue Authority – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Karunakar Srivastava
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

Table of Content
1. details of property purchase and penalty imposition. (Para 2)
2. contention regarding ex parte spot inspection report. (Para 3 , 4)
3. defense argument on property valuation authority. (Para 5)
4. analysis of validity of spot inspection and applicable rules. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
5. quashing of orders based on ex parte nature of inspection. (Para 9)
6. final ruling and order on costs. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

Manish Mathur, J.

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties.

2. Petition has been filed assailing the order dated 30.03.2010 passed under section 47 A(3) Indian STAMP ACT and order dated 17.07.2010 passed under Section 56(1-A) of the Indian STAMP ACT passed in appeal no.127. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner had purchased the property in question which are portion of Gata No.450, 469, Village Dodhepur, Pargana Diksir, Tehsil Tarabganj and District Gonda by means of the instrument of transfer dated 31.05.2008. It is submitted that upon presentation of the said document, proceedings under section 47 were drawn and by means of impugned order, the stamp duty was found to be deficient fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top