SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2292

MANISH MATHUR
Seema – Appellant
Versus
Chief Controller Revenue Authority – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Karunakar Srivastava
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Manish Mathur, J.

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties.

2. Petition has been filed assailing the order dated 30.03.2010 passed under section 47 A(3) Indian STAMP ACT and order dated 17.07.2010 passed under Section 56(1-A) of the Indian STAMP ACT passed in appeal no.127. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner had purchased the property in question which are portion of Gata No.450, 469, Village Dodhepur, Pargana Diksir, Tehsil Tarabganj and District Gonda by means of the instrument of transfer dated 31.05.2008. It is submitted that upon presentation of the said document, proceedings under section 47 were drawn and by means of impugned order, the stamp duty was found to be deficient for which penalty has also been imposed upon petitioner. Appeal against the order has also been rejected.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that upon reference made being 47A of the Act, no spot inspection was ever done despite repeated request of petitioner and the impugned order has been passed only on the basis of an ex parte spot inspector report submitted by the Sub-Registrar dated 05.07.2008. Learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top