Back
RAHUL CHATURVEDI, MOHD. AZHAR HUSAIN IDRISI
Rajendra Bihari Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for writ of certiorari and mandamus. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. investigation status and details of fir. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. profile of petitioners and their relationship with victim. (Para 6 , 9) |
| 4. defense arguments against allegations. (Para 7 , 11) |
| 5. serious nature of the allegations supporting investigation. (Para 8) |
| 6. legal standards for quashing fir. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 7. court's observations on investigation necessity. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 8. final orders regarding petition and investigation. (Para 16 , 18) |
JUDGMENT
Rahul Chaturvedi, J.
Heard Sri Anuj Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri A.K.Mishra, learned Advocate General assisted by Sri P.C. Srivastava, learned Additional Advocate Geneal, Sri A.K.Sand, Government Advocate and Sri Ghanshyam Kumar, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State and perused the records.
2. The instant writ petition is being filed by the seven petitioners, namely, (i) Most Rev. Prof.Rajendra Bihari Lal, (ii) Smt. Rekha Patel, (iii) Prof. Ramakant Dubey, (iv) Sri Vinod Bihari Lal, (v) Prof.Smt. Ranu Prasad, (vi) Rev. David Philiphs and (vii) Sri Sunil Kumar John. All the petitioners are jointly invoking the extra or
The court established that FIRs alleging cognizable offences should not be quashed prematurely; police investigations must be allowed to proceed without judicial hindrance at initial stages.
The court affirms that the police must investigate cognizable offences and the quashing of FIR should be exercised cautiously, only in rare cases.
The court emphasized that the veracity of defense materials cannot be examined at the stage of quashing the FIR and that the power of quashing should be exercised sparingly. It also highlighted that ....
The court emphasized that the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be sparingly exercised and that the court should not interfere with the investigation unless no cognizable offence is disclosed. I....
Inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be applied cautiously, primarily to prevent abuse of process, and FIRs should not be quashed prematurely when allegations disclose a cognizable offenc....
Malicious prosecution claims must show prima facie cases are unfounded; mere political allegations do not suffice to quash FIRs without substantive evidence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
