SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2803

NEERAJ TIWARI
Rammohan Gupta @ Mohan Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Kumar Verma. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Revisionist : Sumit Daga.

Table of Content
1. landlord-tenant relationship is distinct from ownership. (Para 3)
2. necessary parties must prove their necessity in litigation. (Para 4 , 5)
3. dominus litis principle applies; no compulsion to join parties. (Para 6)
4. quashing of the impugned order. (Para 7)
5. court's observations do not affect ownership title. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT

Neeraj Tiwari, J.

Mr. Harshvardhan Gupta, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party nos. 2 & 3, which is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Sumit Daga, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 & 3.

3. Learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that revisionist is landlord of the shop in question and the said shop was let out to opposite no.1. Later on, plaintiff-petitioner has filed Suit No.5 of 2021 against the defendant-opposite party upon which written submission has also been filed by defendant-opposite party no.1 in which he has accepted the relation of landlord and tenant. Now at this stage, opposite party nos. 2 & 3 has filed application under Order 1, Rule 10 of CPC for impleading the applicant as defendant nos. 2 & 3 on the ground that they are actual owner of the landlord

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top