SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1883

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, PRASHANT KUMAR
Singh Traders – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners: Aditya Pandey
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Heard Sri. Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri. Ankur Agarwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. The present petition has been filed praying for the following relief:

    "(i) Issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned demand of penalty order passed in from GST MOV-09 dated 28.2.2024 and in Form GST DRC-08 dated 12.3.2024 (rectification order) passed by the respondent no.2 under the provisions of the CGST/IGST Act and Rules (Annexure-1 to the writ petition)."

3. Limited challenge has raised to the demand of penalty at the higher rate being 100 percent of the value of the goods under Section 129(1)(b) of the U.P. G.S.T. Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to the as, 'the Act') from the petitioners who describe themselves to be the owner of the goods. Therefore, they claim to be entitled to release of the goods against payment of lesser security being twice the amount of the tax under Section 129(1)(a) of the Act.

4. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties have referred to the earlier order passed by this Court in Writ-Tax No. 16 of 2024 (M/s. Green India v. State of U.P. and anoth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top