SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2820

RAJEEV MISRA
Harshvardhan Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Vatsala, Mahendra Singh, Ravi Kant.
For the Respondent: G.A., Avanish Kumar Srivastava.

JUDGMENT

Rajeev Misra, J.

Heard Mrs. Vatsala, the learned counsel for appellant, the learned A.G.A. for State and Mr. Avanish Kumar Srivastava, the learned counsel representing first informant-opposite party 2.

2. This repeat application for bail has been filed by appellant Harshvardhan Yadav seeking his enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 136 of 2020, under Section 376 IPC and section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act, Police Station-Collectorganj, District-Kanpur Nagar during the pendency of trial.

3. The first bail application of appellant was rejected vide order dated 03.08.2021 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 1382 of 2021 (Harshvardhan Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another). For ready reference, the same is re-produced here in under:-

    "1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

    2. This criminal appeal has been filed by appellant Harshvardhan Yadav against the impugned order dated 25.02.2021 of learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Kanpur Nagar, passed in Bail Application No. 729 of 2021 ( Harshvardhan Yadav v. State of UP ), arising out of Case Crime No. 136 of 2020, under Section 376 IPC and section 3(2)5

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top