SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2394

SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
Santosh Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Yogesh Kumar Singh.
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Kumar Singh, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P./opposite party no.1 and perused the record.

2. This application under Section 4 82 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant to quash the summoning order dated 11.08.2021 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mirzapur as well as proceedings of Criminal Case No. 2312 of 2021 (State v. Santosh Kumar Singh) arising out of Case Crime No. 27 of 2021, under Section 188 of I.P.C. and Sections 4 /21 Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act and sections 37, 39 Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, Police Station-Ahraura, District-Mirzapur.

3. The issue involved in the matter lies in a very narrow compass. The main substratum of argument of learned counsel for the applicant is that vide impugned summoning order dated 11.08.2021, the applicant has been summoned under Section 188 of I.P.C., Sections 4 /21 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act and sections 37, 39 of Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 to face trial, whereas the Magistrate concerned was not empowered to take cognizance on the police rep

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top